I mean, this one is an obvious open and shut case isn't it? If you can't control your pet and keep it off of someone else's property (where it then proceeds to destroy something of theirs) then there's not much more you can say. If said pet then needs to go to the vet for something it ate (on their property) there's no reasonable reason why you should then ask the owner of the property to pay for it.
It's not like she intentionally left poison out for the dog to eat or anything sadistic like that. So why should she have to pay a dime?
No comments:
Post a Comment